15 Jul
2014
15 Jul
'14
9:46 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:01:26AM +0100, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
Perhaps we have to wait for Microsoft to produce an (presumably) optional 'correct' pre-processor?
This wait will not be what *you* want, of course!
I thought that the problem with writing a correct preprocessor is that then they would not be able to consume their own headers and probably a lot of customer headers. That would mean restricting it to only new code against a new SDK, and you're going to have a hard time getting _that_ over the "every feature starts at -100 points" barrier. -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se