5 Nov
2017
5 Nov
'17
2:45 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote: James E. King, III wrote: I'm adding boost::uuids::random_device_solo which is a basic_random_generator of random_device (header-only) type, ... That's not a very good name. :-) It's not committed yet. :> ... and documented it as optimal for one-off UUID generation, whereas the standard random_generator is best suited to be reused (in a thread-safe
manner) for multiple uuid generation. You're still using "optimal" only with respect to performance. It's never
optimal for random numbers to not be cryptographically secure. Issues are always welcome.
- Jim