Re: [boost] Dependency report

Andrey Semashev wrote:

Strictly speaking, boost::next/prior is not tied to iterators; it is compatible with any type that has the necessary operators (e.g. integers).

Is it possible to deprecate the use of boost::next/prior for non-iterator types? For non-iterator types, boost::next requires op+ or op+= (and similarly boost::prior requires op- or op-=). I think we can just use op+, unless the type has op+= but not op+. Regards, Michel