Re: [boost] Is there interest in a library for string-convertible enums?

Felix Uhl writes:

I’ve written a small header-only library that uses Boost.Preprocessor and templates to ease the definition of named enumerations that are convertible to and from strings.

Sounds great!

What features would you want from such a library?

Aside from the conversion to strings, only those that enum class offers: being able to specify the underlying type, not being implicitly convertible to any other type, and being able to forward-declare them.