On 26/06/2020 00:07, Phil Endecott wrote:
# It is ok to redistribute this file "solely for informational # purposes in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard". # We don't nee to add a Boost License to this file: boostinspect:nolicense.
Note that I don't know who wrote that, nor where the "solely for informational purposes..." quote comes from. And what are "informational purposes" anyway? - it doesn't sound to me as if that were written by a lawyer.
This really needs an expert to look at it, IMO.
That text appears at https://spdx.org/licenses/Unicode-TOU.html Although that is perhaps an older version of the Unicode license, as it doesn't match what is at https://www.unicode.org/license.html (or at http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html)