On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:12 AM Alexander Grund via Boost
And my remark was that (at least for me) "C++ standard minimum level" is to long and doesn't fully display on the website leading to "C++ standard minimum lev11" to be shown instead of "C++ standard minimum level : 11"
I am good with changing that. Maybe just "C++ standard minimum". I am worried that if we just specify "C++ standard" or "C++ level" there will be programmers who think that if they see, let's say, "11" that they will not be able to use that library unless they are compiling with exactly C++11. I know that may sound ridiculous, but the less confusion the better. "Minimum C++ standard"?
I see that we're explicit about "C++" just in case people interpret it to mean the standards of the other programming languages we support. Glen