On 15 May 2015 at 1:49, Stephen Kelly wrote:
To me, the claim that 'about half (60) of boost libraries have no maintainer' together with the fact that, in general, the boost maintenance model does not like 'community maintained libraries' and the fact only 11 libraries are listed in
I never claimed that. I claimed that by the strictest assessment, about sixty libraries are undermaintained. This might mean bugs open for more than five years, unmerged pull requests for over a year, that sort of thing. Some undermaintained libraries have active maintainers who commit new code weekly or more. They may not send any of that to master branch, and/or not bother with bug fixes in master branch. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/