Re: [boost] What would make tool authors happier..

4 Jun 2015


      On 4 June 2015 at 21:30, Peter Dimov  wrote:
...
Daniel James wrote:
...
On 4 June 2015 at 19:56, Peter Dimov  wrote:
...
...
...
Walking the filesystem produces better results in the following cases:
- when you have manually placed a (proposed) library in libs/ that is >
not yet a submodule
- when you have a Boost directory structure that has no Git metadata
In these cases, why does your tool need to understand git modules?
It doesn't.
So why does it matter where the modules are?