Re: [boost] Extremely large Visual Studio libboost_log_setup* binaries

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Antony Polukhin wrote:

2013/7/3 Andrey Semashev

...

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Antony Polukhin

...

wrote:

...

I'll just explain what confuses me: * Stripped logger library is bigger than any other Boost library.

So what?

Support library for logging is bigger than other libraries (including wave and serialization). You think that it is OK?

I don't see anything wrong with it. As well as I don't see the point in comparing their sizes, unless you have specific requirements. Do not mix chops and flies. Binaries size and duplicate functionality are

different points.

I don't mix anything. The discussion is about binary sizes.

Do I really need to explain why duplicating code/functionality is bad?

No you don't. Do I need to repeat myself about the reasons behind that code?