7 May
2013
7 May
'13
4:59 p.m.
On Tuesday 07 May 2013 17:34:17 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 7 May 2013 17:17, Andrey Semashev wrote:
Noone uses pure 386 these days, so the default in gcc.jam looks inadequate.
I would have chosen a different word :)
It's even been suggested to deprecate 80386 support in GCC, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-12/msg00079.html
It hasn't happened yet, but if/when it does the -march=i386 switch will look even more silly.
Thanks for pointing to that discussion. Turns out 386 actually didn't support atomic ops. :)