Niall Douglas wrote:
At C++ Now a number of informal meetings showed there to be frustrations with the current ecosystem
Why "Boost"? i.e. Why not just start a fresh new collection of libraries? You can easily impose whatever requirements you want regarding build systems, assumption of all C++11 features available, documentation formats. Any interested library authors (existing Boost library authors, or otherwise), will contribute if they like your ideas, or just not get involved if they don't care enough about your ideas. It just seems like the route you're pursuing is going to frustrate you further if it gets no traction. Glen -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Rebooting-Boost-Call-for-Lightning-Talks-... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.