On 10/10/2013 01:09 PM, Sergey Cheban wrote:
On 10.10.2013 12:21, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I understand there's been some discussion about dropping support for compliers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION defined. Has some final decision been made about this? What is the question behind the question? Once the decision is taken, I can get rid of some workarounds in the Boost libs I maintain.
Indeed. I already have patches ready to push which remove the use of the macro throughout boost. I think it is reasonable to push them in several days after releasing 1.55 (providing there is no significant negative feedback).
That makes no sense at all. My patches affect the master branch, not the release branch. I'd prefer to commit them in a few days from now. There's a lot more to do and waiting until November is unnecessary. Thanks, Steve.