El 13/08/2024 a las 12:14, John Maddock via Boost escribió:
We also need this decision to have unambiguous authority. If the Boost Foundation, which has a meeting on Thursday, endorses using the review process to resolve the organization question, then I think we’ll have it.
Since Kristen has already asked for a vote, I believe this particular cat is already out of the bag.
Best, John.
I'm a bit confused about what is Boost Foundation's position right now. Latest minutes are from 2024-06-12 Monthly Meeting, so we don't have context about how Kristen's post (https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2024/07/257301.php) was elaborated. But it's an official position since it was signed by "The Boost Board of Directors". I don't know whether David's proposal is an unofficial update on Boost Foundation's position and how this relates to Kristen's post. It would helpful that the information about Boost Foundation's Board's minutes about this process could be up to date as soon as reasonably possible. Kristen proposed a binary choice that, with a third option mentioned in the ML, maybe made Alliance's proposal (https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2024/08/257347.php) closer to that third option. I think that shows that we listen to each other and try to address some expressed concerns. I certainly encourage proponents of the fourth choice that David mentions in his post to explain the general idea of the proposal in the ML, so that we can enrich and improve the debate. Best, Ion