Re: [boost] [signals2] Uncombined signal

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Ivan Le Lann wrote:

Le 18 avr. 2013 à 17:24, Frank Mori Hess a écrit :

...

I'm not really grasping your use case/motivation for this. Could you just use a combiner that returns a vector of all the individual return values?

I did that. Main problem it that it is not lazy. Not all algorithms dereference all iterators.

Could you define a bunch of different combiner classes all with a common base class, then alternate between them with signal.set_combiner()? -- Frank