Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

25 Oct 2016

      2016-10-25 22:28 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed :
...
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Antony Polukhin  wrote:
...
...
...
2016-10-25 22:00 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed :
...
...
...
...
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Antony Polukhin  wrote:
...
...
...
...
...
Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?
...
...
...
...
Could it be move-only?
...
Memory allocation will happen for each backend in that case, so users
would like to specify allocators... and that's what I'd like to avoid
even more than dangling references.
So okay, propose the frame type as immovable and let's see how
reviewers respond. I think it would be good if your documentation
explains the reasons for this decision: the tradeoffs you rejected.
Good point!

I'll polish the implementation and docs soon.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin