Re: [boost] [atomic] Structs with default constructor

...

...

this will lead to the point that boost.lockfree is broken on the clang toolchain, because the issue which you introduced is *exactly* the same issue as with std::atomic in libc++ [1].

i know more than one project for which this issue is a showstopper ...

I didn't see that Boost.Lockfree was broken. Ok, I'll try to resolve this before the release.

https://github.com/boostorg/atomic/commit/4dee330229c4f54b157ebde9dbd301bb33...

Turned out to be simpler than I anticipated.

thanks a lot!!!!