done: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12536
i'm happy to take a stab at implementing this if you're happy to review it?
On 16 October 2016 at 21:09, Ion Gaztañaga
On 15/10/2016 10:27, Sam Kellett wrote:
Given that Boost.Container has a small_vector now, would a piece of work that changed flat_set and flat_map to use small_vector<0> internally be feasible? I ask because I feel like if this was the case it would be almost trivial to expose flat_tree<N> through small_flat_set<N> and small_flat_map<N> types to provide the small size optimisation for these two containers.
It wouldn't be hard. Some have suggested that flat containers could be adaptors so that the underlying vector-like container could be customized. In any case, the idea of making flat containers compatible with small_vector seems interesting. Please fill a ticket with the request so that it is not forgotten.
Best,
Ion
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost