5 Aug
2013
5 Aug
'13
7:22 p.m.
On 05.08.2013 18:47, Dave Abrahams wrote:
I don't see why bumping a compiler requirement from one set of antiques to another slightly more recent set of antiques is an issue that needs to be suspended for a long time with so much red tape as user surveys. +1
You don't need user surveys. Please just commit the patches today and move on :). Let progress happen and get out of the way :).
+1
Ok, what about dropping the antique C++03? Do you know the current users' demands? I don't, really. So, I think that it would be interesting to see the survey results anyway. -- Sergey Cheban