Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics

On June 6, 2014 4:51:36 AM EDT, "Paul A. Bristow" wrote:

...

-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart Sent: 06 June 2014 03:55 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics

On June 5, 2014 10:08:15 PM EDT, Vladimir Batov wrote:

...

I'll try to re-do the relevant parts as you suggest. Won't do in in a hurry though remembering my experience with

"convert",

...

right? :-)

Since the review hasn't started, change all you like.

I unhappy with a review rigid policy that nothing can be changed during a review. It isn't always helpful.

The policy is that the material under review must not change during the review. There's no policy against providing a copy that reflects ongoing changes. Vladimir began to do just that during the Boost.Convert review.

Can we instead now use git's easy branches to specify a fixed 'master' branch, but allow the author to update a 'develop' branch as the review develops?

Sure ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)