28 Apr
2013
28 Apr
'13
3:50 p.m.
If I ever get my behind in gear on the radix-2
floating-point backend, do you think it potentially be used there in combination with constexpr as well?
Floating point is tough because you have the exponent to deal with.
Oh, I see what you mean. And then there's the conversion from radix-10 to radix-2. One would need a hefty compile-time parser. Still, if I ever get that far, I would like to play around with constexpr and see what the language offers, maybe even in an non-anticipated way. <snip>
Cheers, John.