2 Sep
2015
2 Sep
'15
9:25 a.m.
On 02.09.2015 01:17, Yiannis Papadopoulos wrote:
How about also a stand-alone version so that it can be used with std::atomic<T>?
I wasn't planning that. With a third-party atomic<> implementation it would be impossible to achieve any performance benefits, so the only improvement would be a cleaner code. Boost.Atomic currently doesn't support atomic functions, so providing just one looks awkward and implementing all of them requires more time.