It's rare for me to make an appearance on this list (I'm more an IRC guy), but this will do it. Joel Falcou wrote:
Obviously I don't know how to send an email
I agree :). Joel Falcou wrote:
Some stuff were said and they probably should not have and I would appreciate they stay out of this actual review
I strongly agree. Joel Falcou wrote:
So let's finish this off publicly
No. I think it is best that we do not continue this discussion. This mailing list is indexed and widely read. I think it is detrimental to all parties involved, and the Boost.SIMD library, to get into the details of this matter on this mailing list. Joel Falcou write:
I wish Mathias don't speak on our behalf in this issue as he has no actual claims to do so.
Let's assume that (a) Mathias Gaunard is not intentionally speaking on your behalf; instead, assume that (b) some people were unaware that Mathias and NumScale parted ways and thought that Mathias still represented NumScale. I suspect this thread will be read by many people. So, now the community will know that Mathias Gaunard does not speak for NumScale or you. Therefore, there should be nothing more to discuss. Your desire to ensure that the community does not believe Mathias is speaking on behalf of NumScale is fulfilled. There should be no need for further discussion. TL;DR - I ask that this discussion end here and now. Let this thread die. -- Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ISO C++ Committee Member CppCon and C++Now Program Chair -- -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Mathias-Gaunard-NumScale-relationship-tp4... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.