31 May
2017
31 May
'17
12:35 p.m.
On 30/05/2017 23:34, Gottlob Frege via Boost wrote:
Would you not rather manually "predict" for the valued state?
Predictable latency for success or failure is a key design goal for Outcome. If you want success to be preferred, choose Expected instead.
If success is 0 extra cycles, and failure is 20 extra cycles, it is still predictable, just not equal. ?
No, because for every branch taken on an outcome, you multiply your potential runtime execution paths by two. If success and failure are not balanced, it totally ruins predictability. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/