Re: [boost] [next gen future-promise] What to call the monadic returntype?

25 May 2015

      Niall Douglas wrote:
...
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/BestPracticeHandbook#a8.DESIGN:Strongl...
This section is called

"(Strongly) consider using constexpr semantic wrapper transport types to 
return states from functions"

but I see nothing constexpr in it - the result of calling ::open can never 
be constexpr.

Could you perhaps elaborate a bit on the "constexpr semantic" part?

Re: [boost] [next gen future-promise] What to call the monadic returntype?

Peter Dimov