Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

25 Oct 2016


      2016-10-25 22:17 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed :
...
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Antony Polukhin  wrote:
...
2016-10-25 22:00 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed :
...
...
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Antony Polukhin  wrote:
...
...
...
Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?
...
...
Could it be move-only?
...
So a copy of
`frame` becomes invalid after the stacktrace destruction.
Maybe a frame should be a weak_ptr, accessed with
pointer semantics?
Memory allocation will happen for each backend in that case, so users
would like to specify allocators... and that's what I'd like to avoid
even more than dangling references.

--
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin