Re: [boost] Boost.Build and Microsoft C2 clang

degski wrote:

On 27 June 2017 at 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

...

kind of works. This cannot be considered a serious toolset though. Why not use the LLVM Clang instead?

+1

Clang in the front, but VC in the back, it's a transpiler...

To be fair, I was referring to the Boost.Build support (to the extent there is one) for this toolset, and not to its quality or utility. I also use it from the VS IDE and it's pretty good for double-checking code or compiling something which VC can't. Nevertheless, for those who'd take the advice to use the LLVM one, here's what I have in user-config from last time: using clang : 4.0 : "C:/LLVM-4.0.0-x64/bin/clang.exe" : <compileflags>-fmsc-version=1910 <linkflags>-fuse-ld=lld ;