2015-08-15 9:06 GMT-03:00 Niall Douglas
In fact, if you can achieve a more appropriate name choice, I'll change my vote from rejection to a conditional acceptance as you've done a great job in persuading me from where I was. You've impressed with me your awareness of the tradeoffs involved in a moving API environment, and though I severely personally disagree with your choice of Boost.ASIO over ASIO, I can also see that targeting a more stable API in the form of Boost.ASIO for now makes sense.
How does that sound?
It sounds encouraging. I'm not that resistant to a change of name, but it depends on the new name. I think I'd regret if I accept a name like lowlevelhttp (or one that resembles the same idea) and the library gets stuck with this image forever, even when I implement the high level APIs. -- VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira https://about.me/vinipsmaker