8 Apr
2014
8 Apr
'14
7:16 a.m.
2014-04-08 8:36 GMT+02:00
I am no expert when it comes to assembler variations, but I'd rather not have to have a dependency on MS tools. VC++ et al being the "standard tools on the platform" is part of the problem, not something to be encouraged.
would burden to provide an implementation for each toolset out there (with its own assembler syntax) on my shoulders - and I can imagine that I'll get emails like "... my toolset on this platform with this OS is very important - why are you so lazy not to provide an implementation for it? you must do it immediately ..." - even if I don't have the architecture/OS at home nore documenation or any information at my hand.