28 Aug
2018
28 Aug
'18
2:34 p.m.
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 17:04, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
... would be equivalent to std::atomic?
For that specific reason, yes. So, when your organization then eventually in 2030 (or so) moves to a compiler and STL that supports std::atomic, atomic is guaranteed to work without issue, while at the same time you can provide the play-ground you might like to have. degski -- *“If something cannot go on forever, it will stop" - Herbert Stein* *“No, it isn’t truth. Truth isn’t truth" - Rudolph W. L. Giuliani*