19 Oct
2017
19 Oct
'17
7:30 p.m.
On 10/19/17 11:09 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:
XML may be decent as a way of creating and passing around data in a structured way, but having to write documentation in XML is a hopeless task AFAICS.
Agreed
Quickbook is hugely superior and is a no-brainer to use. If others prefer Asciidoc that's fine also. The point is that nobody need write docs in XML if they do not want to and I do not think that most people want to. I certainly don't.
Agreed. Which is why a looked for a superior alternative editing boost book (XML) files. I found it in XMLmind. Robert Ramey