Robert Ramey via Boost said: (by the date of Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:01:58 -0700)
* If this is so important, why does Boost.Serialization not have it?
Good question. FYI - no one has EVER requested or even inquired about this. I don't think it would be very hard (the xml_archive is hard). Maybe everyone who felt the needed it just made there own. It's also possible that no one uses the serialization library anymore.
I think that it's so good that there is nothing left to ask about (except for problems with serializing boost::optional ;) #165 Vinnie Falco via Boost said: (by the date of Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:46:13 -0700)
Not to put too fine a point on it...but these arguments against Boost.JSON do not withstand any sort of scrutiny; rational readers should find them entirely unconvincing.
Agreed. -- # Janek Kozicki http://janek.kozicki.pl/