Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost

wrote:

I have prepared the pull requests necessary to encode the address-model (32 or 64) in the library names, which allows placing the 32/64 libraries into the same stage/install directory, and building with address-model=32,64 in one go.

What happens if the user leaves off the address-model parameter entirely? I seem to recall that in bjam configs the absence of address-model is different from address-model=32, will that cause different file names? Tom