Re: [boost] Boost, not LEWG

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:19 PM Emil Dotchevski wrote:

Independently, we can work to make Boost better, though I am not sure how. I agree that the mailing list is archaic, but it works great, and I don't think it's an obstacle for anyone. Perhaps I'm wrong about this.

The concrete items mentioned that have been known to inhibit participation appear to be: - Mailing lists - Boost.Build Not sure what to do about the second. I'm happy to help anyone (LEWG or otherwise) produce Jamfiles for their prospective libraries for building, testing, and documentation generation (if Doxygen, Asciidoc). Glen