2013/4/20 Vicente J. Botet Escriba
Would it be preferable to add BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT_11 and change every use of BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT by BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT_11 and deprecate BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT?
I would rather change the definitioon of BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT to # ifdef BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION # define BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(type, assignment) enum { assignment } # else # define BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(type, assignment) static *BOOST_CONSTEXPR_OR_CONST* type assignment # endif Code from example: template <typename T> const bool trait::value; newer was correct, because compilers with BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION define it to enum. So proposed change shall not break correct code. -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin