Re: [boost] unique_ptr for C++03

Markus Mathes writes:

Also the commented out code works for me, but I'm basically only using the [] operator. For gcc 4.6 to compile its only missing the headers for if_ and enable_if and some corresponding namespace issues. To me it looks the main issue is to get the boost::interprocess way of integration right.

At this point it is significantly easier for me to take bits and pieces from Interprocess unique_ptr or Howard's unique_ptr implementation than start from either of them and work towards standard compliance (mainly due to handling of references). I have vetted my implementation to the standard text to get as close to standard behavior as possible, and implemented the library to use C++11 features if available.