25 Feb
2021
25 Feb
'21
9:13 p.m.
On 2/25/2021 3:48 PM, Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:
On 26/02/2021 8:58 am, Robert Ramey wrote:
Right. Still it's only 5 tests. After tracking this down - which took a surprising amount of time given branches, etc - I considered my options and the easiest and most future looking was to just suppress these tests for compilations with C++ version
Conditioning a boost test on boost version < N is equivalent to just unconditionally suppressing it, no?
Isn't the goal to only suppress it when not compiling >= C++11? Shouldn't you just check __cplusplus >= 201103 for that?
Unfortunately __cplusplus is not totally reliable in a number of compiler implementations.