Re: [boost] What to do about std::binary_function andstd::unary_function?

7 May 2016


      On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Peter Dimov  wrote:
...
Either one of those would be fine, although I personally would do something
in-between and only provide result_type for boost::bind, mostly out of
nostalgia. :-)
Shouldn't boost::bind be updated to use std::result_of instead? (That
is, #ifndef BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_FUNCTIONAL from Boost.Config.)

Nick Matteo