Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [Fit] formal review - should we propose some parts to Boost.Config/Boost.Core

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

Others could be considered also as function.hpp, lambda.hpp and lift.hpp, as the macros are there to workaround some missing language features, but those are much more specialized (Boost.Core?)

Boost.Core is where we move code from existing Boost libraries that enables breaking cyclic dependencies between different Boost libraries. I'm not so sure new libraries will need to (or want to) put code there. Glen