On 20/09/2018 16:47, Adam Hartshorne wrote:
Looks like boost::variant is the problem.
No, those are just plain includes. Nothing to see there.
2>C:\boost_1_68_0\boost/type_traits/has_trivial_move_assign.hpp(49): error : no template named 'is_assignable'; did you mean 'std::is_assignable'? 2>C:\boost_1_68_0\boost/type_traits/intrinsics.hpp(233): note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_HAS_TRIVIAL_MOVE_ASSIGN'
The problem is actually here.
As degski suggests, it's probably a compiler detection quirk where the
BOOST_HAS_TRIVIAL_MOVE_ASSIGN macro has been defined because
__has_feature exists but