Re: [boost] Interest in an LLVM library?

Phil Endecott wrote:

Wouldn't this be better hosted by LLVM themselves?

I don't think so. The contributions in this case are defining the EDSL and implementing it in C++. Both require C++ expertise. These do not align well with the interests or skills of the LLVM community, which is focused on developing compiler technology and not necessarily populated with C++ experts. The Boost community seems far better positioned to host a technical C++ library such as this.

What Boost libraries are you using in your implementation?

Only Boost.Preprocessor. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost