On May 26, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Glen Fernandes via Boost
wrote: On Friday, May 26, 2017, Tal Lancaster wrote:
I have been adding C++17 features to date_time. There are two config macros, I would like to have:
Test for C++17’s constexpr inline feature. Maybe call it something like: BOOST_NO_CXX17_CONSTEXPR_INLINE Test for C++17’s structured binding feature. Maybe call it something like: BOOST_NO_CXX17_STRUCT_BIND
How soon do you need these available?
(BOOST_NO_CXX17_STRUCTURED_BINDINGS and BOOST_NO_CXX17_INLINE_VARABLES seem better to me).
I was picking names that described the officialI usage. I am fine with the name alternate if others feel that it is clearer. I’m not particularly tied to the name. As to the timing. I have started using them in my code changes but I am planning on holding off on any pull requests until something more official is in place. Tal