I looked at the documentation on the web site and at ASIO.
However I will probably have to ask a lot of questions about ASIO
phylosophy. It clearly looks like it would be better if possible to extend
ASIO to manage audio devices than creating a new lib. But this suppose that
I progress on ASIO understanding. I think I will have to make a different
post on this subject in the future.
PS, if anyone has feedbacks on this reflection you are welcome.
On 21 April 2013 10:29, adrien courdavault
I will try to see in Trac if anything is related to this and how I could perhaps make a basic. Any help on both the procedure of writing a proposal or the audio_device problem is really welcome to give me directions or advices. I actually don't know what is the procedure for that kind of thing usually.
On 21 April 2013 04:11, Michael Marcin
wrote: On 4/20/2013 5:07 PM, adrien courdavault wrote:
Is there an existing work started inside boost in this subject ? I would be happy to help on this issue.
I have to study ASIO to see the design style, but I have already used most of existing audio device API and librairies that provides portable APIs for this.
Not that I know of, seems like it would be a good addition.
______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boosthttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost