Correction: You are asking about Boost.Geometry performance, not Boost
in general
On 1 March 2018 at 21:26, Ian Kosen via Boost
Hi,
I was looking at this benchmark https://github.com/mloskot/spatial_index_benchmark which attempts to compare the performance between Boost and LibSpatialIndex.
Correction: Between Boost.Geometry...
It caught my eye that Boost was magnitudes faster than LibSpatialIndex. Is there an obvious reason for this? Design considerations and trade offs?
Suggestions: 1. use [geometry] in the beginnig of subject line, so it is clear what library is the thread about 2. You may prefer to post your questions to https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net