5 Dec
2019
5 Dec
'19
5:01 p.m.
On 2019-12-05 19:48, Marshall Clow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:23 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost
mailto:boost@lists.boost.org> wrote: Not a suggestion for 1.72, but we could probably simplify pre-releases naming to just RCn without betas. I.e. we'd have 4-5 RCs instead of RC betas and RCs.
The reason that we have betas is that some external folks (like linux distros) trigger on that. They ignore boost until they see a beta release, then they start testing against that; knowing that a release is imminent.
I assume, they trigger on RCs too, right?