Re: [boost] Boost.Uuid and header-only support

Paul A. Bristow wrote:

I have been following this erudite discussion with interest, but ignorance.

Without wishing to add even more entropy, may I suggest that adding more options is rarely a bad thing, but it creates an even more bewildering set of options for the user (for UUID, I fear as ignorant as I).

That is why I'd like the default generator to do the right thing and doing the wrong thing to be harder and not be presented as an equivalent alternative.