26 May
2017
26 May
'17
4:53 a.m.
On 26/05/2017 00:30, Peter Dimov wrote:
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
I need a default constructor even if uninitialized. What do you think an uninitialized default constructor?
Awful, of course. Gratuitous undefined behavior is never good.
+1 After some exchanges with Jonathan I believe now that we shouldn't have
Le 26/05/2017 à 00:52, Gavin Lambert via Boost a écrit : the uninitialized default constructor. My arguments were wrong and this makes the implementation less efficient and more complex. So either we have the status-quo or we delete it. I start to think that maybe the best would be to remove it :( Best, Vicente