6 Jul
2014
6 Jul
'14
10:57 a.m.
On 07/04/2014 01:22 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
All that said, I agree that Boost.iostreams' fundamental design failure is that it wasn't built atop a 100% async i/o framework like ASIO. Which is a shame, as STL iostreams could do with being replaced.
FYI, Gene Panov has submitted an async extension for Boost.Iostreams: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2013/10/206826.php I have been helping him getting the patch to follow Boost convensions, but perpetual lack of time has prevented me from finalizing it. The current works is at: https://github.com/breese/iostreams/tree/feature/async_stream/include/boost/...