On 29 Aug 2015 at 12:11, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
On 8/29/2015 11:48 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
For the record, I requested that the moderators intervene regarding his behaviour early on in this review as I felt no good was going to come of it. They declined to do so.
This *sounds* deeply concerning. Rather than making assumptions, I would appreciate if you could be a bit more concrete on what you mean by it. If that request took part in email form, perhaps even give us a link to the thread?
I simply forwarded his first two emails with a request that an intervention be made. I don't know what came of it - they may well have intervened and not told me. All I know is he kept coming at me despite my best attempts to ignore him. When he then submitted what I would consider a fake review which would have to be counted in AFIO's acceptance or rejection, I felt I was left no choice but to act in my defense as otherwise my library could be rejected for inappropriate reasons. (For the record, I can see given the reviews to date why it might be rejected anyway, but that's not the point here. If it came down to say a score of 3 in favour and 3 against and his review tipped the scales to 4 against, that would be a big problem). Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/