Re: [boost] [optional] Why was optional<T>::reset() deprecated?

On 2016-03-02 11:39, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

2016-03-02 9:20 GMT+01:00 Andrey Semashev :

...

Having 'reset' also allows not to include boost/none.hpp.

You cannot avoid including boost/none.hpp. Whenever you include boost/optional/optional.hpp, boost/none.hpp is indirectly included.

Well, at least in the user's code I can avoid it (less typing). But isn't none_t.hpp enough for optional's needs?