Re: [boost] Review Request: QVM (generic Quaternion, Vector and Matrix operations library)

I love swizzling although I dislike this particular syntax. I don't see any performance benchmarks which is a deal breaker for me. I'm pretty happy with Eigen3, I don't see where QVM is providing enough value to make me consider switching. Maybe its use as an interop library to stitch disparate libraries together is enough value to include it in boost. But in that case I think maybe a smaller addition to the Boost.Geometry library is more appropriate.